In preparation for “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” I attempted to re-watch 2013’s “Man of Steel,” which I hadn’t seen since it first premiered. It seems that I failed to remember how dull the film is. Honestly, other than Henry Cavill’s strong jaw and even harder build, I found director Zack Snyder’s Superman origin story rather lacking. As a result, I had no idea what to expect from “Batman v Superman,” much less understand all the hype and questions surrounding it.
With Cavill reprising his role as the Kryptonian come to earth, I was most interested to see how Ben Affleck would gel as the Caped Crusader, especially since Christian Bale’s performance as Batman is the one I’ve grown most accustomed to.
“Batman v Superman” opens with Affleck’s voiceover as Bruce Wayne; there’s a short retelling of his parents murders, and then Synder thrusts us forward in time. Through Wayne’s eyes we watch Superman and Zod come to blows as they did in “Man Of Steel,” but this time, the perspective shifts to the massacre left in the wake of the attack. For Bruce Wayne, this moment solidifies his opinions about Superman, and as he watches the chaos around him, it further hardens an already war-weary man.
A great deal happens in this 2 hour and 30 minute homage to two of the world’s most iconic superheroes. Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne’s stories move and shift around one another before colliding epically at the very end. And yet, as someone who admittedly only has surface knowledge of the DC Comic world, I often felt exhausted trying to keep up. The various dream sequences especially, felt overdone. Likewise, Clark Kent’s relationship with journalist Lois Lane relied way too much on the “damsel in distress” narrative in this film. I’ve long since appreciated Synder’s casting of seasoned actress Amy Adams in the role of Lane. Nearly a decade older than Cavill, she’s so much more than a pretty face, but in this film Lane does litte more than wait for her unbreakable beau to come and save her.
Still, for any fan of superhero films, there was plenty to enjoy.
Perhaps it was the extra $25 million Synder had to play with this go-round, or maybe technology has advanced significantly since “Man of Steel” was shot, but either way, everything in this film—fight sequences included—was more lush and fun to look at. As for Affleck, what he brought to the character of Batman was surprisingly one of my favorite parts of the film (though his beefed up Batsuit and voice were comical at best). Massive, despite his humanity at 6’4,” Affleck’s Bruce Wayne is broody and somber. This is Batman in his 40s, with hair streaked silver and weary lines around his eyes. Bruce Wayne has seen and done just about everything at this point, and it shows. Caring deeply about others has cost him a great deal and he does not apologize for his apathy. The only time his eyes truly come alive is when he’s interacting with his trusty confidant Alfred (played to perfection by thespian Jeremy Irons) or when he’s trying to flirt with Diana Prince aka Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot), who will be getting her own film next year.
More than anything, Affleck’s portrayal of Bruce Wayne is fixated on the legacy he’ll leave behind.
Continue reading at Shadow and Act.
Image: Warner Bros.